Wole
Soyinka, Nobel Laureate,scholar and foremost social critic, has released a
statement denying reports that he trashed the Igbos during his lecture titled ‘Predicting Nigeria, Electoral Ironies’
at the Harvard University Hutchins Centre for African & African American
Research, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, last
week. Soyinka was quoted to have said 'the Igbos voted based on their stomach
and suffer from incurable money mindedness'. The Nobel Laureate says he never
made a statement like that and anyone who believes he did is a moron. Lol. His
statement below...
"I have just read a
statement attributed to me on something called The Cable, a news outlet,
evidently one of the Internet infestations. My lecture at the Hutchins Centre,
Harvard University, was video recorded. Anyone who believes what I am alleged
to have said must be a moron – repeat, a moron. It is demeaning, sickening and
boring to have to deal with these cowards who cannot fight their own battles
but must fasten their imbecilic pronouncements on others. Only the mentally
retarded will credit this comment attributed to me regarding the Ndigbo voting
pattern in the last elections. I strongly suspect the author of this despicable
concoction, and may make a further statement, once the source is verified.” the
statement read
“Igbos
remained unrepentant and resolute towards their strategic objective of
secession at worst; or a Nigerian president of Igbo extraction at best,” he
said at the lecture, which held on April 29.
“The climax of MASSOB’s war against the Nigerian state was the call for sit-ins and civil disobedience that shut down markets and public services, as Igbos stayed at home in a symbolic gesture to assert Biafran independence. The call was honoured by governors in the two principal Ibo states, though without fanfare.
“The climax of MASSOB’s war against the Nigerian state was the call for sit-ins and civil disobedience that shut down markets and public services, as Igbos stayed at home in a symbolic gesture to assert Biafran independence. The call was honoured by governors in the two principal Ibo states, though without fanfare.
“The
Igbos are probably the only group of Nigerians that you can predict with great
accuracy whom they will vote for in an election, because they tend to put their
votes where their stomachs take them; suffering as it were, from incurable
money-mindedness, as they would stop at nothing in their quest for personal financial
gain.” Commenting on the result of Nigeria’s presidential election, Soyinka
said the re-election of President Goodluck Jonathan would have been
“disastrous”, as Muhammadu Buhari, Nigeria’s president-elect, is better
option. “Muhammadu Buhari was the better of the two evils as the incumbent
president Goodluck Jonathan had been an unmitigated disaster and failure,” he
said.
“It was a
painful decision to tell people to vote Buhari, but the country needed a new
beginning. I was more against Jonathan, than I was pro-Buhari.
“Nothing is more unworthy of leadership than to degrade a system by which one attains fulfillment, and this is what the nation witnessed time and time again under Jonathan, who was increasingly becoming intolerant of opposition in an escalating streak of impunity and authoritarian madness, which was most blatant and unconscionable.
“Nothing is more unworthy of leadership than to degrade a system by which one attains fulfillment, and this is what the nation witnessed time and time again under Jonathan, who was increasingly becoming intolerant of opposition in an escalating streak of impunity and authoritarian madness, which was most blatant and unconscionable.
“The
‘militricians’ – soldiers turned politicians in power – aren’t looking for
excellence; their civilian cohorts are worse. Short cuts and how to circumvent
the system for the profit of a few are the norm of governance. Those who do
honest work are derided as lacking the skill to fit it. Ironically, things
haven’t quite changed a bit after 16 years of democracy in the country.”
No comments:
Post a Comment